classification of plant and animal kingdom pdf

Classification Of Plant And Animal Kingdom Pdf

On Monday, December 28, 2020 10:16:05 AM

File Name: classification of plant and animal kingdom .zip
Size: 1457Kb
Published: 28.12.2020

plant kingdom questions and answers pdf

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy.

Log In Sign Up. Download Free PDF. Darwinian classification of plant and animal taxonomical evidences opposite to Darwin's theory. Ahad, PhD. Download PDF. A short summary of this paper. IntroductionEvolution suggests that life arose by the natural process from non-living materials and achieved its present diversities including man [1]. Darwin defined evolution as the descent with modifications through the natural selection from a few common ancestors [2]. However, there are some evidences, which support the doctrine of evolution.

These evidences are drawn from many areas of biology [8]. In the "Origin of Species" Darwin critically and masterly summarised the evidences of evolution and these have been enlarged since his time [9]. These evidences have overwhelming convinced the biologists about the validity of the evolutionary theory-taxonomical evidences classification of plants and animals are the one of them [10]. Darwin pointed out that "from the first dawn of life, all organic beings are resembled each other in descending degrees, so that they can be classed in groups under groups.

This classification is evidently not arbitrary like the grouping of the stars in constellations [2] ". All biologists use taxonomic information in their research. They attempt an organism to place into a group [11]. The actual practice of classifying is usually called taxonomy or systematics [12]. In opposition, phylogenetic taxonomy has seen some inherent problem. Even, if one can work out about the true evolutionary history of a group of organism, no taxonomist can classify than a way that everyone accepts it [15].

Taxonomy can never indicate evolution exactly [16] Many of the modern evolutionary classifications have more in similar with the Bentham and Hooker [17]. An ideal phylogenetic system, however, not yet arrived [18]. Thus, there is a doubt and contradiction about Darwinian classification. So, it needs to remove the uncertainty and contradiction from the taxonomy for the benefit of modern biological science.

But the review of literature reveals that there is no such type of article as "Darwinian classification of plant and animal taxonomical evidences opposite to Darwin's theory". Therefore, this article aims to prove "Darwinian classification of plant and animal taxonomical evidences opposite to Darwin's theory". Working on the above objectives is essential.

This article would be beneficial to the student of taxonomy and taxonomic researcher as well as who studies on evolution. Candole's system is not Darwinian at all. Bentham and Hooker system was directly patterned on that of de Candole's system [13]. So, Bentham-Hooker's system is not phylogentic at all, since it is based on single characters and nothing has been said about dicot and monocot [19]. Engler never considered his system to be phylogenetic [21].

Also, phylogentic system of Eichler was not a phylogentic system in the modern sense [13]. Number of families: In Bentham and Hooker's system, the numbers of families are ; where as in Engler and Prantl's system, the numbers of families are ; but in Hutchinson's system the numbers of families are Placing of taxa before or later such as orders, classes and families: Darwinian classificationsIn Bentham and Hooker's system, Gymnosperms are placed in between dicots and monocots; the family Composite is placed at the beginning of Gamopetalae under Asterales.

Again, Gramineae is considered as a most advanced family; placed at the end of monocots under the series Glumaceae. But in Engler and Prantl's system, gymnosperms are placed before angiosperms i. Composite is placed at the end of Dicotyledonae under the last order Companupalatae of Sympetalae; whereas in Hutchinson's system, Gymnosperms are places before angiosperms, i.

Compositae is placed under herbaceous under the order 2nd one Asterales and Gramineae is given the highest place as the last family, under the Giumiflorae [13 and 20]. Therefore, the main difference between Engler and Pranttl's system with that of Bentham and Hooker is the amalgamation of Polypetalae and Monoclamydeae [19]. This is proved that Engler and Prantl, Hutchinson systems are not Darwinian, as they differ from Bentham and Hooker system by a number of families and placing of the family before or after and amalgamation of Polypetalae and Monoclamydeae.

So, Hutchinson systems, Engler and Prantl's system are more or less similar Bentham and Hooker system. Thus those systems are not Darwinian systems. Again, Hutchinson's system has provided a sound basis for the later Darwinian systems of Tippo, Cronquist, Takhtajan and other [21].

So, it is proved that Hutchinson's system systems are not Darwinian. Consequently, systems of Tippo, Cronquist, Takhtajan and other are not Darwinian. Whereas, the Hutchinson's system based on the assumption that plants with sepals and petals associated with other primitive floral are more ancient phylogenetically than a flower with sepals and petals free floral are regarded as primitive and connate parts as more recent [20].

As a result, the system of Engler and Prantl's has been subjected to heavy criticism as tending to obscure the phylogeny of the angiosperm [19]. Assumptions are one kind believe but "believe is not science as believe in God is not science [3] ".

Hence, Hutchinson systems and Engler and Pranttl's systems are not valid as Darwinian or evolutionary classification systems. All modern Darwinian classifications are not based on fossils records-Darwin [2] declared: "he, who rejects these views on the nature of geological record fossil , would rightly reject his whole theory" Origin of Species, p. Thus, the fossils are the main evidence of Darwin's theory [22]. But it is documented that the fossil record of angiosperm provides little help to taxonomists in separating the concept of evolutionary origin and diversification.

Phylogeny of incorrectly interpreted in the absence of known evolutionary sequence based on little fragmentary fossil [23]. A recent investigation of fossils does not lend support to Engler' and Pranttl's system [19].

So, post-Darwinian system of classifications is not based on evolutionary relationship, but claimed to be evolutionary [17]. In addition, the phylogenetic classifications proposed after Darwin's theory, are mostly claimed to be phylogenetic but not true phylogenetic classifications [21].

Various literature demanded absence of Darwinian classification both in plant and in animal kingdomNumerous literature demanded that absence of Darwinian classification both of plant and in the animal kingdom. Because both plant and animal are classified according to Linnaean system and this classification still exists in the taxonomical world, even classification of microorganism. The documents are placed here: i. In general, the classifications schemes are Linnaean, which constructed from the phenotype similarities, all which may be observed [24].

As a result, the present classification system of animals and plants arrange species into higher groupings species, genus, family, order, class and phylum that are proposed by Linnaeus [25]. So, biologists still use the Linnaeus' classification system for plants and animals [26]. According to World Book Encyclopedia of Science' plants and animals are classified according to the botanist Carolos Linnaeus [27].

The above literature verified that both plants and animals are classified according to Linnaeus' system. Linnaeus in the tenth edition of "Systema Naturae" listed different scientific names for animals. Since these names represented a large spectrum of forms, shapes, and sizes of animals, he adopted a system of grouping similar genera together as orders, and grouped similar order as classes. He grouped all of the classes of animals together as members of the animal kingdom, as distinct from the plant kingdom [28].

Hence, it is again documented that in modern times naming as well as animals are classified according to Linnaeus' system. Linnaeus adopted a nine order classification of insect such as Aptera, Orthoptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Lepidotera, Diptera, Thysanoptera and Hemiptera. These orders are large and most of the insect belong to these orders and still unmodified. However, modern entomologists have added to its some minor orders but very few insect belong to it.

Even maximum scientific name of insect and other animal is specified by Linnaeus [29]. Hence, it is documented that insects are classified according to Linnaeus' system, i. Many taxonomists support the organization of a vast number of organisms on earth by grouping those with similar characteristics and comparative morphology through Linnaean system of classification of the five kingdoms such as Monera, Protsita, Fungi, Plants and Animals [30].

The above statement of Wallace indicates that not only plants and animals but also microorganisms are classified according to Linnaeus' system. It has been demonstrated that classification of maximum information content are those in which the taxa recognized are the result of evolution. Such classification is presented as a hierarchy. In taxonomy, this hierarchy is referred to as a Linnaean hierarchy such as class, order, family genus and species [12].

Above literature proved that evolutionary classification means Linnaeus's classification and animals are classified according to Linnaeus' system. Pre-Darwinian biologists were able to develop taxonomy to classify the living organisms that was useful, which was based on their morphology, principally the comparative anatomy of adults without giving any importance of evolutionary relationship [33].

World famous three taxonomists, E. Mayr, E. G Linsley and R. Usinger declared that taxonomic classification is existed before the theory of evolution was accepted by biologists, and even today it may be pursued without regard to phylogeny classification and in dominated taxonomy for the next century, and most of the essentials of Linnaean method are still components of modern taxonomy [26].

Linnaean Linnaeus' rules of binomial nomenclature the goal of taxonomy is universally employed throughout the taxonomical worldOne of the principal goals of taxonomy is the naming of organisms [8,13,14]. The proper naming of living organism is the province of the science of taxonomy [16].

Numerous recent literature support that Linnaeus' binomial nomenclature formulation for the scientific name of every species are universally employed throughout the taxonomy: ii. Taxonomy aims to tag a name to every species of animal in the animal kingdom. Since species name is a universal name. Linnaeus early adopted the case of two names for each species: the genus name and the species namecalled binomial [22] ; so, the Linnaean system of classification each distinct kind of animals receives to names which together constitute the scientific name of the species [34]..

This Linnaean system of classification binomial nomenclature is universally accepted and employed throughout the biological world [26, 21 and 35]. In addition, Linnaeus's 'Rules and Laws of nomenclature' were chosen as starting points for the 'Botanical and Zoological Nomenclature' for valid names [26].

Fathers of taxonomists whose classification systems are still universally used did not believe in evolution, which also support absence of Darwinian classifications Fathers of taxonomists whose classification systems are still universally used did not believe in evolution, which also supports the absence of Darwinian classifications and writings are placed here: i.

He Linnaeus defended the idea of the persistence of the species so vigorously, which was a problem long after words to the establishment of modern evolutionary theory [32]. John Ray , another founder of modern taxonomy, believes in the unchanging of the species.

Five Kingdom Classification of Plants and Animals

College Biology Multiple Choice Questions and Answers PDF exam book to download is a revision guide with biology quiz questions and answers PDF on topics: Bioenergetics, biological molecules, cell biology, coordination and control, enzymes, fungi, recyclers kingdom, gaseous exchange, growth and development, kingdom animalia, kingdom plantae, kingdom prokaryotae, kingdom … Biology MCQ Questions with Answers PDF Download. Image Source: c A student discovers an arachnid with a segmented abdomen, long legs, and a tail with no stinger. Give an example of plants with a. Haplontic life cycle; b. Diplontic life cycle ; c.


CLASSIFICATION OF ANIMALS. The Animal Kingdom is laid out from the simplest to the most complex phyla as follows: Phylum. Sub Phylum or Class. Protozoa.


Darwinian classification of plant and animal (taxonomical evidences) opposite to Darwin's theory

History Biography Geography Science Games. Search Ducksters. An example of Classification Biological classification works a bit like the library does. Inside the library, books are divided up into certain areas: the kids books in one section, the adult books in another, and the teen books in another section. Within each of those sections, there will be more divisions like fiction, non-fiction.

Are you familiar with the five kingdoms of living things?

Skip to content. All Homes Search Contact. Plant Kingdom Classification Class 11 Notes. They grow from seeds, produce flowers, seeds and die in the same years. Contain chlorophyll and carry out photosynthesis2. Students will cut and sort clues into categories. Biological Classification of Plants and Animals.

College Biology Multiple Choice Questions and Answers PDF exam book to download is a revision guide with biology quiz questions and answers PDF on topics: Bioenergetics, biological molecules, cell biology, coordination and control, enzymes, fungi, recyclers kingdom, gaseous exchange, growth and development, kingdom animalia, kingdom plantae, kingdom prokaryotae, kingdom … MCQ quiz on Cells multiple choice questions and answers on cells MCQ questions quiz on cells objectives questions with answer test pdf. Why rockets using liquid hydrogen have higher specific impulse compared to liquid hydrocarbon? Register online for Biology tuition on Vedantu. This solution contains questions, answers, images, explanations of the complete chapter 3 titled Plant Kingdom of Biology taught in Class So, let's try out the quiz about Nine phyla of the animal kingdom and test your knowledge. Plant Kingdom. Add some animal magic to your next virtual pub quiz with these animal questions answers included cambridgenews.

Millions of living things inhabit our planet, but did you know that they are divided into five separate kingdoms?

english pdf guide pdf

2 Comments

  1. Fronicdropthi

    This lesson explores the classification system used to identify animals.

    05.01.2021 at 02:48 Reply
  2. Benedicta T.

    Marketing management 14th edition kotler and keller pdf body language gestures and their meanings pdf file

    06.01.2021 at 09:51 Reply

Leave your comment

Subscribe

Subscribe Now To Get Daily Updates